Ideas for Veson Nautical Feature Board as submitted to our Feature Upvote board. Ideas are ordered by 'new' and the 50 top matches are included. pr_08webslmbpn2urw 2023-04-04T10:12:48Z sug_hodbsvnjfmilzgh 2025-10-24T09:53:55Z 2025-10-24T13:53:00Z It would be good if we could access the Distances Tool also in IMOS X on the phone. sug_3j2jzokrku00wgd 2025-10-10T07:57:39Z 2025-10-24T14:01:46Z We want more granular permission control for address book and vessel 1. Business personnel can edit the address book and vessel, but do you want business personnel to create/delete new vessels and addresses? 2. In addition, it is desirable that the remit bank information and customer information in the address can be edited by the business, but the main information cannot be edited. For address, the main message is short name, fullname; for vessels, the main message is imo number, vessel name sug_p0jnk4f0ltfodtg 2025-10-01T13:12:08Z 2025-10-24T13:54:26Z In voyage manager you can overtype the vessel and IMOS retrieves relevant info. Same does not hapen in Vessel list (vessel details page - data center) sug_or6uq6awisqjzha 2025-09-25T07:03:35Z 2025-10-24T13:53:55Z When a voyage is completed at the beginning of the month and the status of the next voyage is set to "Commenced," the ROB at the start of the next voyage is currently being recorded as the ROB for the MACR. We request a system enhancement to ensure that, even if the next voyage is marked as "Commenced," the ROB at the end of the month is correctly recorded for the previous voyage when the voyage spans across the month-end. sug_2flsy0i848gtvjg 2025-09-22T19:37:58Z 2025-09-25T13:41:14Z To help us quickly identify estimated laytime in VIP that has not yet been calculated by Claims Hub/DA Desk, we would like all estimated laytime in VIP without a calculation from Claims Hub/DA Desk to be defaulted to the status “Preliminary” (as shown in the screenshot below), which will allow us to easily include these calculations in a BI report. We would also like to be able to restrict the List of Status values to 'Preliminary', 'In Progress' and 'Settled'... by being able to 'hide' the Laytime status values that we do not use. Thanks John sug_jxhqlcieo7j234f 2025-09-22T18:11:12Z 2025-09-25T13:41:38Z I would like to add a visible alert on the cargo screen when a particular cargo group is selected. An alert can currently be added, but to see the alert, the user must explicitly click the tasks and alerts icon. This is not a sufficient warning. A possible implementation example is the port field on the voyage manager. When a particular port is selected, the field background turns red and the user can hover to see the message. sug_myw7gtmbdrgugsp 2025-09-22T08:18:59Z 2025-09-22T12:44:21Z Good day, In FFA trade, after entering a trade in the list view, it would be extremely helpful if the Rate/Lump (the percentage of commission charged by the broker on each trade) could be displayed directly in the main list view. This addition would greatly assist with month-end reconciliation, as it would allow us to easily identify the commission deducted by each broker. For example, as shown in the attached screenshot, the value “0.1” appears, but it is not currently visible in the main list view. Having this field available at a glance would make it much easier to reconcile different trades and quickly see the rate charged by each broker. Additionally, I noticed there is no filter option for Rate/Lump in the main screen, which limits our ability to sort or search by this value. Request for adding the Rate/Lump field to the main list view for FFA trades. Thank you! sug_krcvatd1bgymys5 2025-09-17T08:05:01Z 2025-09-19T19:02:03Z Presently in conversion/reversion report, we can see the date for conversion/reversion is appearing in GMT format only. It should also contain local date which vessel staff add to the veson forms. sug_qmzler3xljuq6zi 2025-09-17T06:32:59Z 2025-09-19T19:02:25Z Vessel card to maintain a revision history. Track changes via Audit Trial report in vessel master data. Especially Checked/unchecked "Active for Veslink". sug_w11dbqgowd58l9x 2025-09-09T02:25:39Z 2025-09-15T13:18:23Z Proposal to Add “Voyage P&L Var (Act - Posted)” to the VoyageList Screen Due to frequent operational needs to sort by “Voyage P&L Var (Act - Posted),” we propose adding this item to the list on the right side of the VoyageList screen. This enhancement would improve usability and efficiency for many users. VoyageList画面への「Voyage P&L Var (Act - Posted)」項目追加の提案 実務上、「Voyage P&L Var (Act - Posted)」でのソートが必要となる場面が多いため、VoyageList画面右側の項目リストへの追加を提案いたします。この改善により、多くのユーザーにとって使いやすさと業務効率が向上すると考えられます。よろしくお願いいたします。 sug_vfojerdhvijstwq 2025-08-29T12:46:54Z 2025-09-04T13:51:03Z In the COA details now only the demurrage costs can be changed to the broker as a default. There is no box for the freight to do the same. It's a bit off this is not possible sug_eywktdeyagj7dk2 2025-08-22T12:02:10Z 2025-09-04T13:52:00Z We have a requirement from the business where they are looking for a functionality in IMOS (other then Journal Entry) probably something like a cash management module to transfer cash between bank accounts. Two requirements needed as per below: 1. IMOS to provide functionality for bank to bank payments. 2. IMOS to provide functionality to track interest on cash for a bank balance. sug_dax2gdxms90rrvq 2025-08-20T12:09:32Z 2025-09-04T13:52:14Z When CFGEnableItinLaycanFields is enabled it adds laycan fields to Cargo/Itinerary tab, however these fields have to be manually updated as well as the laycan fields on the cargo header. This is unnecessary double entry and seeing different values at cargo header and load port itinerary line is misleading (at best). Suggest that the cargo header laycan dates should be sync'd with the itinerary dates on (first) loading port call line. sug_ocwbdpqko1rwxex 2025-08-18T10:52:33Z 2025-09-04T13:52:40Z When multiple bunker lifts are done during a TC-IN and these are paid for by the shipowner (Paid by TCI-OWNER in bunker lifting window, voyage detail), it is not permitted to include the price for each bunker lift. Only an average price is permitted in the Supplement to Delivery section of the TC-IN, and this average price is applied to all bunker lifts. This is incorrect, causing the bunker PNL for each voyage to be incorrect when any of these lifts are consumed. It also shows the same price for all lifts in the owner's payment details, which is not the reality. It is necessary to be able to include the actual price for each lift so that the PNL is calculated correctly for each voyage and the payment for the owner show each lift with its corresponding price. A solution would be to allow the price to be included in the bunker lifting window for each bunker lift when Paid By TCI-OWNER is indicated, or to be able to include multiple lines of supplements to delivery, not just one. sug_obwzoltqmbfxdng 2025-08-08T13:25:13Z 2025-08-11T18:20:46Z It would be helpful and timesaving feature to have a copy function on unpriced elements which not only adds an empty element but preserves the setup of the element intended to multiply. E.g. unpriced element for hire with a certain structure setup which in a long TC can be repeated many times (20x or more). sug_hnkjz9prau62yoh 2025-08-08T11:30:54Z 2025-08-11T18:24:03Z Summary: The Sustainability tab on the IMOS voyage screen provides real-time metrics such as Total CO₂ Emitted,Fuel Consumed,Distance Sailed,Cargo Carried, AER, and CII Rating.These insights update as the voyage progresses, providing valuable real-time data at the individual voyage level. IMOS Analytics currently lacks a way to extract or view this data across multiple voyages in one place. Having this feature would be highly beneficial,as it would offer a more user-friendly way to access key metrics-allowing users to view data for multiple voyages in a single consolidated report, rather than checking each voyage individually Solution: It would be helpful to have the key data points from the Sustainability tab made available in a way that allows teams to create their own real-time reports. This would make it much easier to track and compare emissions and other sustainability metrics across multiple voyages, vessels, or even entire fleets—all in one place. Instead checking each voyage sug_mngoqz562rqf6w2 2025-08-07T18:55:10Z 2025-08-11T18:25:01Z Expand Invoice Default rules to default additional field values, particularly when creating AR invoices for rebilling Owner's Expenses. Fields to include: Bill To (default to vessel owner) Invoice Date: Today Payment Terms: Net 15 days (or create a Config flag to define default) Remittance Bank (need to be able to set default bank account per currency on Bank Account List?) Defaulting these values would save time for each invoice occurrence as well as reduce the opportunity for user error by selecting the wrong value. The defaults should of course be amendable by the user at invoice creation time. Thanks John. sug_gubictgtmdl3qa7 2025-08-06T10:03:18Z 2025-08-11T18:28:13Z It would be nice to be able to add a port before a port where we already inserted bunkers inside. Now you have to delete the bunker stem and then add the port and then put the bunker stem back in the system. sug_qjbwhprs0zzwbut 2025-08-04T06:36:54Z 2025-08-11T18:45:01Z The new feature of creating Fuel Version would be helpful if there is provision to change the Fuel Version field under existing TC contracts, Head Fixtures etc. The Fuel Version is defaulted to 'Version 0' which is the legacy. This does not help even if you create new version under vessel details as Head Fixture is associated to the estimate/voyage. To record EU ETS contract all the voyages are associated with the Head Fixture so this feature is of no use to companies like us or who have vessels on long term period. sug_lqh9zhfsdy6fhwe 2025-07-25T10:19:42Z 2025-10-24T13:55:17Z As some systems consider .eml files to be insecure, it would be nice to have an option to forward messages as e.g. .zip format. sug_lgaqn5sybadnjng 2025-07-23T12:52:47Z 2025-07-23T14:40:32Z As an Admin, I would like to have a comment field in the Business Rules table, to capture audit-relevant information (e.g. when a rule is modified, who modified it and why). sug_w2hlgducc09veaz 2025-07-23T12:50:40Z 2025-07-23T14:40:51Z To be compliant with Audit requirements, we would like to have an audit trail of all changes done to the Business Rules table, displaying the change done, the username who modified the rule and when this was done. sug_goxhcehilgfmb4e 2025-07-21T19:06:36Z 2025-07-23T14:42:58Z Enhance the functionality of time offsets under Unpriced Elements to ensure the correct rate is reflected in the Trade Details List for all TC contracts. sug_xdeyrxuhtepp9qd 2025-07-17T12:15:49Z 2025-07-23T14:43:27Z In other expenses/revenue we post sometimes invoices which needs to be rebilled to charterer. Therefore we post is as rebill expenses. When issuing the Rebill invoice I am not able to add a line. We would like to be able to put 2.5% commission on top of this Rebillable Expenses and invoice it to charterer. sug_blvbriatbhc9zcf 2025-07-16T16:04:22Z 2025-07-23T14:48:28Z The Sustainability panel currently displays the total bunker consumed in metric tonnes, which works if all fuel types are set to metric tonnes in the vessel file. However, this total is incorrect when one of the fuel types is set to litres in the vessel file and is received and consumed in litres during the voyage. The Sustainability panel incorrectly adds the litres consumption as metric tonnes to the total bunker consumed. Instead, it should convert the litres to metric tonnes based on the conversion factor set in the 'units of measure' screen. Please fix this issue in the Sustainability panel. sug_zg1zxrmbvf6jwpx 2025-07-14T07:02:54Z 2025-07-23T14:48:11Z Dear Veson Team & Community, we'd like to suggest the implementation of a global report that allows users to identify all voyages containing a red warning triangle, indicating invalid or illogical data entries (e.g. due to missing or conflicting voyage parameters). Currently, such warnings are only visible within the individual voyage screens, which makes it difficult to track issues systematically across the fleet or organization. A centralized view would greatly improve data quality control and workflow efficiency. It would also be helpful if the error messages could be categorized by area (e.g. bunker, cargo, ports, etc.) so we can quickly address the responsible inputs and users. This feature would provide valuable transparency and help ensure that operational and financial reporting remains accurate and consistent. Thank you for considering this suggestion! Best regards, Mathias Lechelt sug_jd0uhgfs3xkqdvj 2025-07-09T08:09:39Z 2025-07-23T14:44:17Z As well as at the voyage itinerary there is the "TSdays" column, would be really good to have the same matching column in estimates as makes comparisons and checks between voyage and estimates a lot easier. Currently the estimate has only the columns "SDays" and "XSD" estimates which makes the comparison between voyage and estimate data more challenging, especially if you consider these values are rounded numbers, having maximum of 2 decimals shown. sug_cttewfmlwqujnum 2025-07-09T04:10:34Z 2025-07-23T14:45:29Z Hi Veson Support, I would like to suggest to have a config flag to enable an alert in operations invoice to remind user to review financials invoice before send for approval. the alert should appear if the status of the financials invoice is still not V. The alert should work as per config flag CFGOpsRequirePaymentTerms for our company, the review of tax code which available in financials invoice should be review at operations level before it submitted for approval. reason is because operations level would know better the nature of the operational activities. without this alert, there will be a lot of invoice will send for approval without tax code. sug_wxhhuufjwdmzkxb 2025-07-08T09:14:02Z 2025-07-23T14:46:19Z In some cases a scrubber fitted vessel may have LSF fuel on board that they want to consume before switching to HSF. There is currently no way to override the scrubber consumption to force the system to use the LSF first. Scenarios a) Vessel previously bunkered LSF because no HSF was available. Now need to burn this fuel to free up tank space for more HSF. b) Vessel has LSF on board that is cheaper than currently available HSF. sug_jj3vnjqd34pvcid 2025-07-07T08:33:52Z 2025-07-07T13:42:15Z Can we have a report which show all the data from hire Statement PDF in the form of analytics report as it will give us outstanding balance of all the TCO's sug_9rwa0yg3ziec9dd 2025-06-27T05:50:03Z 2025-06-27T13:28:25Z As a Finance Manager I want to be able to enter comments/remarks when reversing payments, stating the reason of such reversals. Reversal comments for payments have not been found in the IMOS system. Reversal comments are only found for invoices because both are separated into two different forms. sug_bjvwh2hdpscpwqg 2025-06-26T06:09:53Z 2025-06-27T13:31:52Z Currently, exclusion of accrual/provision entries must be done per vessel, which is time-consuming. Instead of going into each vessel one by one, you'd like to apply the exclusion in bulk for multiple vessels at once. Introduce an option to exclude line items from accruals at the Fixture level, applicable to multiple vessels in one go. Ideally, this could be implemented in one of the following ways: 1. Exclude from Accrual" Flag at Fixture Level 2. Rule-Based Exclusion Logic 3. Upload Template for Bulk Exclusion Above are just suggestion you are more expert to give suitable option which feasible, error free and less time consuming. It would be helpful to all users across Imos community. sug_ojm9cqzqy5ice4o 2025-06-25T05:56:56Z 2025-06-27T13:32:07Z As an Operations Manager I want to be able to toggle between ports in the estimated demurrage to avoid having to create a new calculation every time, especially on parceling business. sug_ujjg99llb6fka8j 2025-06-20T02:44:36Z 2025-06-23T15:00:43Z Regarding the IMOS functionality, when I click on an item in “Revisions” to check the details and then go back to “Revisions” again, it takes me back to the top of the list. Is it possible to make it so that when I go back to “Revisions” after checking the details of an item, I go back to the item I was looking at, not to the top of the list? sug_5rnjonu13dnw5fm 2025-06-19T11:28:56Z 2025-06-20T08:30:09Z Currently in IMOS the timezone is at GMT0. would like to request for the timezone to be able to change to our desired timezone, e.g. GMT+8. reason is because this is used for our financial cutoff time. sug_0oi5mzaproegr5p 2025-06-16T09:51:03Z 2025-06-23T15:00:59Z EUA certificates can only be transferred in full units, not decimals. We suggest to add a ConfigFlag for rounding of the EUA qty on allowance inoices when the settelement type of the contract is set to allowance. sug_mjjya3vci9kz0wo 2025-06-13T05:28:04Z 2025-06-23T15:01:24Z Regarding the subject matter above, we would like to convey our request for improvement on the IMOS Voyage screen. You can jump to a different issue by entering the "Vsl Code / Voy No." field on the Voyage screen. I would like this operation to allow me to check not only the Voy No. but also the Voy Ref No. The reason is that, due to our convenience, when a VIP error is received, only the IMOS Vsl Code and Voy Ref No are notified. Since the Voyage No. is not listed, if I can search by Ref No. on Voyage, the process will proceed more smoothly. sug_89ih6iebtze1b9n 2025-06-12T03:33:59Z 2025-06-12T19:48:14Z We would like to request the Veslink platform to enable the Port Disbursement form view for agents, specifically to include: Percentage of Total Disbursement Actual Advance Payment Details Currently, these fields are not visible to agents, requiring Marine Operations to manually send emails to inform agents of the PDA payment value date and the amount paid. By enabling this view, we aim to replace the manual process with an automated solution, which we believe will significantly streamline communication and enhance operational efficiency. sug_3g48ykwfyhbvfh1 2025-06-11T08:29:07Z 2025-06-12T19:47:10Z It will be a nice feature, if the User-Defined Fields could be expanded with a multi-select checkbox option, so you can select multiple values from a dropdown list, and it will be shown as comma separated values in the value field. It should not replace the existing dropdown list option, but be an additional feature. sug_nn1uffrvzb6jftl 2025-06-09T04:24:32Z 2025-06-09T13:41:39Z Request Summary In the Bunker Purchase Order screen, there is a checkbox called “Hide Lines with Zero Quantity.” Right now, this checkbox is not checked by default. However, our team always checks it first whenever we open a PO. We are requesting to make this checkbox ticked by default, so users don’t have to do it manually every time. Why This is Needed: This checkbox is used every time, and manually checking it is repetitive. If we forget to check it, it can cause confusion by showing unnecessary lines. It would save time and improve accuracy if the box was already checked when we open the screen. What We’re Suggesting: We would like this checkbox to work like the Port Expenses screen, where a config flag (CFGHideZeroPortExpenses) allows similar behavior. We asked Veson, and they said this feature is not currently available. So we’re asking to either: 1)Make the checkbox checked by default, or 2)Add a config setting to control this behavior. sug_f2z3hihx9muru3f 2025-06-06T10:57:49Z 2025-06-06T14:32:05Z We want to limit a user's permissions based on charter party, so that we can protect our key account information, and not disclose to un-authority users. sug_9qak9rsy6nhjhei 2025-06-06T07:50:16Z 2025-06-06T14:32:27Z Would like to have the option to amend COA pricing during the course of the COA contract. Whereas currently , amending COA pricing ( for example with a price additional going into effect during the running COA) automatically also amends the pricing of the COA shipments already done...which should obviously not be the case. So if we can have a tab in the COA to add a price additional ...set from a certain date within the contract, this prevents us from getting into copying the coa and making a 'second' version. sug_oplnym3pvtzqe2j 2025-06-04T13:26:29Z 2025-06-06T14:32:53Z Hi Team, We can notice that IMOS is allowing to create payments for the Invoices which exceeds the invoice amount. PFA the screenshot. Although it prompts the user with warning but it does not restricts the user from making such payments. There should be a way in the system to restrict the users from creating such payments as such payments creates a break in Bank Reconciliation. I was checking Task & Alert but seems like it does not applies to the payment screen. Business Impact: Such payments creates breaks in the Bank Reconciliation process. Regards, Shikhar sug_fachcn5dzfk3wru 2025-05-30T12:44:29Z 2025-06-02T13:50:53Z 'Last TCI Voy' or 'Last TCO Voy' in Voyage Manager shall be automatically tick if the linked TC contact is Trip TC (contract type = Trip TC). (Raise on behalf of client) sug_ezcki8g8hrng8mv 2025-05-29T07:16:42Z 2025-05-29T13:51:35Z Suggestion is to prevent batch payments on calendar holidays. So for example if selecting batch date a US holiday for USD payment batch , system to prompt \ warn \ or block you from doing so. sug_4zj1cnuxu2u4i0b 2025-05-27T08:28:32Z 2025-05-27T12:49:54Z The system-generated bunker adjustments created when there is a variance in the bunker calculation method (i.e. FIFO vs LIFO) are not posted to SAP. These variances typically occur because there are different bunker calculation methods for different deal types. TCI's typically calculate on a FIFO (First In First Out) basis, whilst TCO's typically use LIFO (Last In First Out). Across a re-let deal this creates a P&L valuation variance. As a SETTLEMENTS ANALYST I need the system-generated bunker adjustments, created when there is a variance in the bunker calculation method (i.e. FIFO vs LIFO) to be automatically posted to SAP. To prevent large PnL variances on these voyage types without manual entry. sug_bn4xiqpw2lodbii 2025-05-27T08:23:50Z 2025-05-27T12:50:29Z There are different bunker calculation methods for different deal types. TCI's typically calculate on a FIFO (First In First Out) basis, whilst TCO's typically use LIFO (Last In First Out). Across a re-let deal this creates a P&L valuation variance. This is mainly caused because whilst the bunker quantities should be updated via the BOSS forms, the bunker prices on the TCOs are only typically updated at the end of the voyage. This is a vital step for the settlements calculations that is reliant on a manual update step where this information is already available in the system meaning that these prices COULD have been populated from the start. As a freight trader I should have the ability to select a bunker pricing methodology (FIFO/LIFO/Last Purchase Price) on TCOs so that the bunker prices can be calculated and auto-populated at the beginning of the voyage. So that the variance is correctly accounted for from the start and not reliant on a manual update step at the end of voyage. sug_hubhsrenshs2mo0 2025-05-21T01:35:14Z 2025-05-27T12:50:56Z As an Operations User, I want to be able to select/choose the items that should not be included in the Hire Statement, to remove all entries and contra-entries that are not relevant to the Owners/Charterers, therefore presenting a clean and accurate statement to our counterparties. On a daily basis, contra-entries need to be entered in order to reverse previous payments (e.g. Scrubber Premium, Owners Expenses, Surveys, etc.), creating a long list of items in the SOA which looks messy, confusing and unprofessional, especially on long term/period vessels. sug_xqgqahq6wdvbgqu 2025-05-15T12:16:34Z 2025-05-15T13:01:05Z As an operator or accounting manager I need to be able to upload the original invoice from vendor when generating an invoice in IMOS in the Bunker Survey costs module. Today, there is no "attachment" button so the underlying invoice cannot be attached to the Invoice. This is however possible for "Other rev/exp" type of costs. To not being able to see the underlying invoice when approving og posting the invoice is a dealbreaker for us as the person in charge cannot verify the validity of the invoice (without finding the underlying elsewhere, which is not a viable option) sug_utrzanrunf0lxib 2025-05-13T13:20:49Z 2025-05-15T13:01:23Z TORM requests an enhancement in IMOS to allow FuelEU costs to appear only in the Estimate column, without showing in the Actual column. TORM has decided to calculate the actual cost of FuelEU externally, as the result per voyage in IMOS is incorrect with the FuelEU included. TORM would like the FuelEU to be included in the Estimate as it is important for Chartering decisions. When inactivating the ‘Include in P&L’ for FuelEU on the voyage, it also deletes the FuelEU in the Estimate column. Meaning the Estimate result and TCE in the P&L would differ from the Estimate. This is not an option. Currently, the ‘Include in P&L’ flag applies to both columns, requiring manual updates for each voyage in the Agreed cost (set to zero 0) in FuelEU.